[联邦登记册：2009年5月21日（第74卷，第97号）] [注意事项] [Page 23901-23902] ======================================================================= ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------科技政策政策执行办公室主席;透明度和公开政府概要：主席2009年1月21日，备忘录题为，透明度和公开政府，指导首席技术官，与管理和预算办公室（OMB）和一般服务管理局（GSA）协调，制定一系列建议，该建议将向开放的政府指令提供通知。该指令将由IMAN发布，并将指示执行部门和机构对执行总统备忘录所规定的原则的具体行动。邀请公众的成员通过电子邮件或白宫网站参与制定建议的进程http://www.whatehouse.gov/open.gov/.提供关于可能倡议的评论，想法和提案以及如何增加政府开放性和透明度。日期：必须在2009年6月19日之前收到评论。地址：按以下方法之一提交评论：http://www.whatehouse.gov/open.gov/.。电子邮件：[电子邮件受保护]。邮寄：科技政策办公室，ATTN：开放政府推荐，725 17th Street，华盛顿特区，DC 20502.可以向公众在线或通过替代手段向公众提供评论。因此，请不要在您的评论信息中包含保密性的信息，例如敏感的个人信息或专有信息。如果您提交电子邮件注释，您的电子邮件地址将自动捕获，并将其包含在公共码头上的注释的一部分，并在Internet上提供。有关详细信息，请联系：科技政策办公室，ATTN：开放式政府，725 17th Street，NW。，华盛顿特区，DC 20502.补充资料：2009年1月21日，总统备忘录，执行部门和机构负责人，在联邦登记册上发表[74 fr 4685，2009年1月26日]，总统概述了推广透明和开放政府的三项原则：透明度促进问责制，向公民提供关于他们的政府在做什么的信息;参与通过点击社会广泛分散的知识来提高政府的效力，提高其决策的质量;和合作利用创新的工具，方法和系统，以促进各级政府和私营部门的合作。总统备忘录要求建议通知AMOM指令，将指导执行部门和机构对执行透明度，参与和合作的三项原则的具体行动。本联邦注册通知的目的是征求公众参与这些建议的制定。 There is a great deal of dispersed information among the nation's citizens. With twenty-first century tools, the United States is in a unique position to take advantage of that dispersed information to inform the policymaking process. Our goal is to use the principles of open government to obtain fresh ideas about open government itself. Comments on open government may relate to government-wide or agency-specific policy, project ideas, and relevant examples. Comments may address law, policy, technology, culture, and practice on issues such as: What government information should be more readily available on-line or more easily searched? How might the operations of government be made more transparent and accountable? How might federal advisory committees, rulemaking, or electronic [[Page 23902]] rulemaking be better used to improve decisionmaking? What alternative models exist to improve the quality of decisionmaking and increase opportunities for citizen participation? What are the limitations to transparency? What strategies might be employed to adopt greater use of Web 2.0 in agencies? What policy impediments to innovation in government currently exist? What changes in training or hiring of personnel would enhance innovation? What performance measures are necessary to determine the effectiveness of open government policies? This public process is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. John P. Holdren, Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy. [FR Doc. E9-12026 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3170-W9-P