[国会记录第158卷第85号(2012年6月7日星期四)][众议院][H3618-H3652] 2013年国土安全拨款法案[…[英语泛读材料全体修正案由Aderholt先生提出主席先生，我现在正摆着一项修正案，请大家一致同意审议该修正案。代理主席。阿拉巴马先生的请求有人反对吗?没有人反对。代理主席。书记将指定修订案。修正案全文如下:在法案末尾(简短标题前)插入以下内容:行为引发的任何资金可用由国土安全部可以使用任何其他联邦机构租赁或购买新的轻型车辆,对于任何执行舰队,或一个机构的舰队库存,除了按照总统Memorandum-Federal舰队表现,2011年5月24日。__秒。__。 None of the funds made available by this Act may be used for the purchase, operation, or maintenance of armed unmanned aerial vehicles. ____ Sec. __. None of the funds made available under this Act may be used in contravention of immigration laws (as defined in session 101(a)(17) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(17))). The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to the order of the House of today, the gentleman from Alabama (Mr. Aderholt) and a Member opposed each will control 5 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Alabama. Mr. ADERHOLT. Mr. Chairman, this amendment combines three separate amendments which were outlined in our unanimous consent agreement earlier. The first, from Mr. Engel, has a limitation on funds for the lease or purchase of new light-duty vehicles that are not in accordance with the President's fleet efficiency standards. {time} 1940 The second amendment is from Mr. Holt. It is a limitation on funds for the use of armored, unmanned aerial systems. And the third is from Mr. Price of Georgia. It's a limitation on funds being used in contravention of the Nation's immigration laws. I would urge my colleagues to support the adoption of this en bloc amendment. I yield back the balance of my time. Mr. DICKS. Mr. Chairman, I move to strike the last word. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Washington is recognized for 5 minutes. Mr. DICKS. If I can ask the chairman a question on this, it says none of the funds made available by this act may be used for the purchase, operation, or maintenance of armed unmanned aerial vehicles; is this from Homeland Security? Is this prohibition on Homeland Security? Mr. ADERHOLT. That is correct. Mr. DICKS. Has there ever been any plan to buy armed drones by Homeland Security? Mr. ADERHOLT. No. Mr. DICKS. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the en bloc amendment offered by the gentleman from Alabama (Mr. Aderholt). The en bloc amendment was agreed to. [...]